Insights · Case review

Case review: a French founder, a Luxembourg holding and a Luxembourg bank account

A plan we hear every month: put the French company under a Luxembourg holding, take dividends instead of salary, and receive them on a personal account in Luxembourg. We walk through it step by step and show every point where French and Luxembourg law meet it.

Reading time8 minutes
FormatCase review, problems only
Rules as ofOctober 2026
AuthorAlexander Baranov
The short version

The founder still lives in France, so France taxes what he receives at 31.4%, whatever the route. Along the way the plan meets the place-of-management rule, the substance and beneficial-ownership tests, the treaty's purpose test, article 123 bis, the disguised-remuneration and social-security rules, the foreign-account declaration and, above all of them, abuse of law. This note lists the problems; it deliberately does not solve them.

01 · The case

The plan, as it is usually presented

A French entrepreneur, resident in France, owns a profitable French company. Someone suggests a structure: a holding in Luxembourg, the French shares contributed to it, dividends flowing to Luxembourg, a minimal salary in France, and the money paid out to a personal account in Luxembourg. On a whiteboard it looks like lower tax, money abroad and more freedom.

1Set up a Luxembourg holding

An S.à r.l. owned 100% by the founder, who lives in France.

2Contribute the French shares

The founder transfers his shares in the French operating company to the holding.

3Dividends go to Luxembourg

The French company pays its profits as dividends to the Luxembourg holding.

4Cut the salary

The founder reduces his salary from the French company to the minimum.

5Pay himself from Luxembourg

The holding pays dividends to his personal euro account in Luxembourg.

This note does not judge the entrepreneur and does not offer a fix. It walks through the plan step by step and shows where it meets French and Luxembourg law. Every point below is one we see in real files.

The founder still lives in France. Every euro that ends up in his pocket is French-resident money, whatever country the bank is in.
02 · The holding

Step 1: a Luxembourg holding run from France

  • Where is it really managed? Under the France–Luxembourg treaty a company is resident where its effective management is. A holding whose only director lives in France and decides from France can be treated as French-resident, and taxed in France as if Luxembourg did not exist.
  • Is it a real company or a letterbox? A domiciliation address, no people and no decisions in Luxembourg are what both tax administrations call an artificial arrangement. That label switches off the EU directives, the treaty benefits and the French exceptions for EU companies.
  • Luxembourg asks too. The holding pays a minimum net wealth tax every year, must file accounts and returns, and its own tax office applies the same substance logic to a company that only receives and passes on dividends.
03 · The contribution

Step 2: contributing the French shares

  • The gain is not erased, only deferred. Contributing shares to a holding the founder controls defers the capital gain under article 150-0 B ter. The deferred gain remains attached to him and is reported every year.
  • A foreign holding must qualify. The deferral is open to EU holdings only if they meet the conditions of the regime, and the contribution is filed and followed in France.
  • Selling later has strings. If the holding sells the French shares within three years, 70% of the proceeds must be reinvested in business activities within three years and kept for five, under the 2026 rules.
  • Leaving France later. If the founder ever moves abroad, the deferred gain and the shares of the holding enter the French exit tax calculation.
04 · Dividends out of France

Step 3: dividends from France to Luxembourg

  • The 0% is conditional. France waives withholding tax on dividends to an EU parent only if the conditions are met and the arrangement is not put in place mainly for that benefit. Otherwise French withholding applies.
  • Beneficial ownership. A holding that receives dividends and immediately pays them on to its shareholder is the textbook conduit of the CJEU Danish cases: the benefit can be refused because the holding is not the real owner of the income.
  • The treaty has a purpose test. The France–Luxembourg treaty of 2018 contains a principal purpose test. A structure whose main purpose is the tax result loses the treaty rate.
  • Holding period. The French exemption expects the shares to be held for at least two years; dividends paid earlier rely on a commitment that can be called in.
05 · The salary

Step 4: cutting the salary

  • Remuneration in disguise. Replacing a salary for work done in France with dividends from a foreign holding can be challenged as disguised remuneration for that work, taxed and charged as salary.
  • Social security does not stop at the border. Dividends paid to some French company managers above a threshold are already subject to social contributions; routing them through a holding does not make the question disappear.
  • The founder's own cover. A minimal salary means minimal pension rights, sickness and unemployment cover for a person who still works full time in France.
06 · The money

Step 5: dividends to a personal account in Luxembourg

  • France taxes the dividend anyway. A French resident pays French tax on dividends from a Luxembourg company: 31.4% flat tax since 2026. Luxembourg withholds 15% first; France gives a credit, so the total is still French tax, with an extra layer of paperwork.
  • Article 123 bis. A French resident holding 10% or more of a foreign entity whose assets are mainly financial, in a regime that taxes far less than France, can be taxed each year on its profits as if distributed. EU entities are excluded only if the structure is not artificial.
  • The account is visible. A foreign bank account must be declared every year on form 3916. The fine is EUR 1,500 per account, undeclared transfers are presumed taxable income, and the tax office can look back ten years. Luxembourg banks report to France automatically under CRS.
  • Abuse of law. If the main purpose of the whole chain is tax, the French tax office can disregard it under the abuse-of-law procedures, with penalties of up to 80% for the most serious cases.
07 · Summary

The risk map

StepMain riskWho looks at itSeverity
Holding run from FranceFrench tax residence of the holdingFrench tax officeHigh
No substance in LuxembourgArtificial arrangement, loss of directives and treatyBoth administrationsHigh
Contribution of sharesDeferred gain, reinvestment and exit tax conditionsFrench tax officeMedium
Dividends to LuxembourgFrench withholding, beneficial ownership, PPTFrench tax officeHigh
Minimal salaryDisguised remuneration, social contributionsTax office and URSSAFMedium
Dividends to the founderFrench tax at 31.4% in any caseFrench tax officeCertain
Holding with financial assetsArticle 123 bis annual taxationFrench tax officeMedium to high
Luxembourg accountForm 3916, CRS reporting, presumption of incomeFrench tax officeHigh if undeclared
Whole chainAbuse of law, up to 80% penaltiesFrench tax officeHigh
08 · Your version

Where does your version of the plan break?

Every version of this plan is different. Mark yours and see which points light up.

Where does your version of the plan break?

Describe your own set-up. The check lists the points a French or Luxembourg tax inspector would look at first. It does not tell you how to fix them.

Who sits on the holding's board?
What does the holding have in Luxembourg?
Why does the holding exist, on paper?
How long has the holding owned the French shares?
What happens to the dividends?
The founder's salary now
The Luxembourg personal account
Thinking about a structure like this?We tell you what a tax inspector will see before you build it.
Book a review
01Residence decides

The founder lives in France, so France taxes what reaches him.

02Substance or nothing

A holding run from France is a French company with a foreign address.

03Visibility is total

CRS, form 3916 and treaty exchange make the account visible.

04The plan is the risk

Each step can be defended alone; the chain as a whole is what gets challenged.

Your structure

Considering a structure like this, or already in one?

We review it the way a tax inspector would, before the inspector does, and tell you plainly what holds and what does not.